TC
![](/ch/images/star2.gif) ![](/ch/images/star2.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif) ![](/ch/images/star1.gif)
¤å³¹: 90 ¨Ó¦Û: ¶m¤U¦a¤è
![](/ch/images/pixel.gif) |
¤_ 2007-01-24 02:23 ![§â¤å³¹¤º®eÎ`¨î¨ì°Å¶KªO¡C
¥uÓì¥Î¤_ IE :-)](/ch/images/icons/icon_copy.gif)
LC wrote: TC wrote: Could anyopne tell me which SG meter is preferred for a newbie like me? optaical one or the primitive one? and what brand and around how much? Thanks very much. SG meter need not be very accurate. A cheap primitive one is adequate. Fishes can adapt to a wide range of SG. A stable SG is good enough for keeping marine fishes. Hi LC, Thanks for your advice. However, my fishes got some white spots, although i have been adding copper to my FOT for more than a week, those white spots are still come and go like ghosts. That's why i am thinking of reducing the SG. But i don't know whether the primitive one can give me a safe reading say i want to lower the SG to 1.010. Any advice on it?
|