Topic: 喉底架pump sizing?

  Print this page

喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: kkp9320
Posted on: 2006-03-01 21:55

各位師兄, 在下[$#40060]缸size: 40' W, 20'D, 30' H, UGF with 4-5' 沙,
1) 想問問個pump flowrate 應 幾多l/hr?
2) 現時為2500l/hr water pump, 是否太大?
3) 如太大, 加個水流器ok? (同相中左面個pump果個一樣)
多多指教

回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: Saltfishman
Posted on: 2006-03-01 22:58

你約380l水,use 2個2000 or2200

回覆: 回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: kkp9320
Posted on: 2006-03-02 00:40

Saltfishman wrote:
你約380l水,use 2個2000 or2200



but i also have a 1200l/hr 濾筒. the existing flowrate of the pump is 2500l/hr and i feel the flow is too large

回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: capmo
Posted on: 2006-03-02 12:28

點解個缸搞到10號波咁?

回覆: 回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: KKP
Posted on: 2006-03-02 12:48

capmo wrote:
點解個缸搞到10號波咁?




hello campo,
do u remember the red coral stone?
thank you very much.
搞到10號波咁:
因為唔想缸中右下內角有死水, 所以加個氣石打氣(口黎)做水流, 再加個喉底架pump, 所以好多泡泡.如果switch off the air pump, no bubble will appear.

回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: capmo
Posted on: 2006-03-02 14:30

記得,不用客氣.

你在鬧市中定有各版主及魚友幫到你.

FOT缸你有濾筒,底喉泵及一個做流泵,水流應己作夠.另FOT多魚,應考慮skimmer 的重要性.衹需耍有泵使缸底的水,流至缸面排出CO2換入O2便可,
不用氣泵了,太花怎樣看魚呢?

FOT單向水流便可以,可否集中各出水口,由一上角噴向對角,做成單一水流循還至濾筒吸水處.

RT才需做亂流.如發現魚有不妥行為,需要才加多個水流泵做流.

另底喉pump底喉泵越勁, 吸力越大, 藏垃圾越多, 要適可而止800至1200都可以(這是丁兄從前教我的)

回覆: 回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: fat2005b
Posted on: 2006-03-03 07:25

capmo wrote:
記得,不用客氣.

你在鬧市中定有各版主及魚友幫到你.

FOT缸你有濾筒,底喉泵及一個做流泵,水流應己作夠.另FOT多魚,應考慮skimmer 的重要性.衹需耍有泵使缸底的水,流至缸面排出CO2換入O2便可,
不用氣泵了,太花怎樣看魚呢?

FOT單向水流便可以,可否集中各出水口,由一上角噴向對角,做成單一水流循還至濾筒吸水處.

RT才需做亂流.如發現魚有不妥行為,需要才加多個水流泵做流.

另底喉pump底喉泵越勁, 吸力越大, 藏垃圾越多, 要適可而止800至1200都可以(這是丁兄從前教我的)


capmo兄,請問用吸底好,定係用谷底好

回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: capmo
Posted on: 2006-03-03 15:08

這也是覆述從前丁兄教我的答案:

"唔可將舊底喉改反向, 混瀆事小, 反缸都有份. "
所以我個人認為除非底喉意外淤塞,不要自找煩惱.

固然反方向行底喉是一個方法.但傳統底喉法以行之有效及有極好口碑.
如正確使用,一兩年應不致淤塞反缸,那時魚友早已決擇繼續換大缸養魚或早已放棄.

回覆: 回覆: 喉底架pump sizing? Copy to clipboard
Posted by: fat2005b
Posted on: 2006-03-03 16:51

capmo wrote:
這也是覆述從前丁兄教我的答案:

"唔可將舊底喉改反向, 混瀆事小, 反缸都有份. "
所以我個人認為除非底喉意外淤塞,不要自找煩惱.

固然反方向行底喉是一個方法.但傳統底喉法以行之有效及有極好口碑.
如正確使用,一兩年應不致淤塞反缸,那時魚友早已決擇繼續換大缸養魚或早已放棄.


唔該capom兄

我地有 在新的聊天室
即時聊天廣播.
Hosted by DownTown®
All Rights Reserved.

[Processing Time] User:1.34, System:0.23, Children of user:0.03, Children of system:0.08


請大家技持更換新主機啦, 多謝!